I recently received this viral email and I think it well worth posting here for you to enjoy. (It has been edited to reflect a web presence rather than email).
Let me make this perfectly clear!
THIS IS MY COUNTRY!
And because I make this statement DOES NOT mean I'm against immigration!!!
YOU ARE WELCOME HERE, IN MY COUNTRY!
Welcome! To come in legally:
1. Get a sponsor!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!
6. Learn the LANGUAGE (English) as all immigrants have in the past!!!
AND
7. Please don't demand that we hand over our lifetime savings of Social Security Funds to you.
If you don't agree for fear of offending someone, then YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!
When will AMERICANS STOP giving away THEIR RIGHTS???
We've gone so far the other way... bent over backwards not to offend anyone, but it seems no one cares about the AMERICAN CITIZEN that's being offended!
WAKE UP America !!!
[Editorial Note from the G Pact Team]
This applies to you Christians too! Stand up for what you believe.
Don't let these socialist lefties tell you that you are wacky because
you worship "the fairy god in the sky" or pick your offensive remark.
I have handled this by asking them why they feel the need to
disparage me when I see them equally of not more wacky for NOT
believing in God.
They are telling us that the United States is not a Christian nation, and some of you are starting to believe it. Well, don't. Those people are afterall, clueless.
Paul Johnson, British historian said it best...
"Both in Virginia and New England to the North, the Colonists were determined God-fearing men often in search of a religious toleration denied them at home. Who brought their families and were anxious to farm and establish permanent settlements.
They put political and religious freedom before riches, thus took shape the economic dynamo that eventually became the United States, an experiment designed to establish the rule of God on this Earth."
If that doesn't mean a "Christian nation," I don't know what would.
Friday, May 7, 2010
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Politics and "Death Threat" Double Standards
This morning while having breakfast, I found myself in my usual multitasking mode and was reviewing the news to see what damage our illustrious dear leader, the chosen one was doing. Okay, unilaterally giving up American military superiority to the Russians again. I don't know whether to learn more Russian or continue with Chinese.
Anyway, as I bounced around from story to story, AOL news had a story about a San Francisco man named Gregory Giusti, 48, who was arrested for (get this folks) "allegedly making dozens of threatening phone calls to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over health care reform."
The FBI would not comment on the charges because they were under seal, but again this brings up another example of "double standards" when compared to actions against those who made WORSE comments against former President George W. Bush which often went unquestioned, un-arrested, and unpunished and what is happening today when people use their First Amendment right to criticize the members of the Regime in Washington.
For more info and some great pictures, please see ---> http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621
I would like to be clear that I do not believe that it is proper to threaten to kill anyone but law enforcement has a duty and obligation to take ALL threats against ALL of our leaders EQUALLY! The way to take care of politicians who don't do what we believe is correct is at the ballot box, and believe me the next few elections must bring about a large changeover for America to go back to it's former glory and moral values.
You know, my "real job" is in a Federal Agency and since I am an appointed uniformed federal officer, most of my peers may be surprised to hear that I also have law enforcement authority. It's part of the job. I bring this up because I also took an oath when I received my federal appointment. The same oath every federal law enforcement officer and federal employee takes. That oath requires me to protect and defend The Constitution of the United States. Did you catch that? The CONSTITUTION -- Not a President, nor a Party!
Do you guys at the FBI, Secret Service, et al... get that? The CONSTITUTION! Not the Bama, not the Bush. Do your jobs fairly and even handedly. Apparently the lefties in those organizations take action when they feel threatened so you righties had better start when it happens against our guys. Remember that history tells us that most wacky actions are taken by the left, and not the right.
This brings up another concern which may be related. A few months back, we had a service talk and we were told that under the Hatch Act, we were not "allowed to discuss politics in the workplace." It would not be tolerated and "violators" would face disciplinary action. Well, I'm don't take kindly to stupidity and actually looked up the Hatch Act and guess what? Nothing in it prohibits what we were told that it did. It says I cannot discuss politics with civilians I come into contact with in an official capacity, or use my position of authority to influence their voting decisions, or run for a political office if it involves a "partisan" stance. Nothing in Hatch prohibits political speech in the workplace. In my opinion, this was a blatant attempt by the Regime to silence opposition speech within the ranks of the federal workforce. That's how it starts.
I still talk politics at work and don't fear retribution. Why? Because I have a copy of the Hatch Act in my desk should I "face discipline" however that would be bad because I would consider legal action against the government for infringing upon my Constitutionally protected right to speak against the government when it does things I believe to be wrong.
Don't you begin to fear either. That's what the Regime wants. Look at Venezuela.
Anyway, as I bounced around from story to story, AOL news had a story about a San Francisco man named Gregory Giusti, 48, who was arrested for (get this folks) "allegedly making dozens of threatening phone calls to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over health care reform."
The FBI would not comment on the charges because they were under seal, but again this brings up another example of "double standards" when compared to actions against those who made WORSE comments against former President George W. Bush which often went unquestioned, un-arrested, and unpunished and what is happening today when people use their First Amendment right to criticize the members of the Regime in Washington.
For more info and some great pictures, please see ---> http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621
I would like to be clear that I do not believe that it is proper to threaten to kill anyone but law enforcement has a duty and obligation to take ALL threats against ALL of our leaders EQUALLY! The way to take care of politicians who don't do what we believe is correct is at the ballot box, and believe me the next few elections must bring about a large changeover for America to go back to it's former glory and moral values.
You know, my "real job" is in a Federal Agency and since I am an appointed uniformed federal officer, most of my peers may be surprised to hear that I also have law enforcement authority. It's part of the job. I bring this up because I also took an oath when I received my federal appointment. The same oath every federal law enforcement officer and federal employee takes. That oath requires me to protect and defend The Constitution of the United States. Did you catch that? The CONSTITUTION -- Not a President, nor a Party!
Do you guys at the FBI, Secret Service, et al... get that? The CONSTITUTION! Not the Bama, not the Bush. Do your jobs fairly and even handedly. Apparently the lefties in those organizations take action when they feel threatened so you righties had better start when it happens against our guys. Remember that history tells us that most wacky actions are taken by the left, and not the right.
This brings up another concern which may be related. A few months back, we had a service talk and we were told that under the Hatch Act, we were not "allowed to discuss politics in the workplace." It would not be tolerated and "violators" would face disciplinary action. Well, I'm don't take kindly to stupidity and actually looked up the Hatch Act and guess what? Nothing in it prohibits what we were told that it did. It says I cannot discuss politics with civilians I come into contact with in an official capacity, or use my position of authority to influence their voting decisions, or run for a political office if it involves a "partisan" stance. Nothing in Hatch prohibits political speech in the workplace. In my opinion, this was a blatant attempt by the Regime to silence opposition speech within the ranks of the federal workforce. That's how it starts.
I still talk politics at work and don't fear retribution. Why? Because I have a copy of the Hatch Act in my desk should I "face discipline" however that would be bad because I would consider legal action against the government for infringing upon my Constitutionally protected right to speak against the government when it does things I believe to be wrong.
Don't you begin to fear either. That's what the Regime wants. Look at Venezuela.
Friday, April 2, 2010
CONGRESSMAN FEARS GUAM TIPPING OVER
On April 1, 2010 during a hearing of the Congressional House Armed Services Committee regarding relocating 8,000 naval personnel and their families to the Island of Guam which is a territory of the US, Congressman Hank Johnson, Jr. (D-GA 4) made a comment regarding the stability of the small island.
It wasn't the political or economic stability of the island that concerned him but the man was clearly afraid that the additional population may cause the island to tip over into the Pacific Ocean.
Johnson was quoted as saying, "My fear that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize," as he emphasized his statement by making a tipping motion with his hands.
Adm. Robert Willard, who made his best effort not to burst out in laughter responded "We don't anticipate that..."
While many are citing the fact that he has Hepatitis C, from the research that I have done on the disease it does not appear to have an effect on someone's brain. The Congressman later explained in a statement that he was merely using the concept of capsizing as a metaphor for the stress that 8,000 soldiers and their families could put on the tiny island.
If anything, those additional troops would be a plus to the local economy and not a negative.
Guam's Congressional Representative Madeleine Bordallo doesn't believe the congressman was serious. "He was saying that in jest. I don't know how it was said or when, but I know Congressman Johnson; he's been here. I'm sure it was just a joke," she said during a radio interview.
This story reminded me of the wacky remarks by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA 35) during the "Rodney King riots in Los Angeles where she stated that people were looting stores for diapers and baby formula. The only problem with the statement is that gun shops don't sell diapers and baby formula.
These are the people who run the country. Totally acluistic (meaning they don't have a clue).
It wasn't the political or economic stability of the island that concerned him but the man was clearly afraid that the additional population may cause the island to tip over into the Pacific Ocean.
Johnson was quoted as saying, "My fear that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize," as he emphasized his statement by making a tipping motion with his hands.
Adm. Robert Willard, who made his best effort not to burst out in laughter responded "We don't anticipate that..."
While many are citing the fact that he has Hepatitis C, from the research that I have done on the disease it does not appear to have an effect on someone's brain. The Congressman later explained in a statement that he was merely using the concept of capsizing as a metaphor for the stress that 8,000 soldiers and their families could put on the tiny island.
If anything, those additional troops would be a plus to the local economy and not a negative.
Guam's Congressional Representative Madeleine Bordallo doesn't believe the congressman was serious. "He was saying that in jest. I don't know how it was said or when, but I know Congressman Johnson; he's been here. I'm sure it was just a joke," she said during a radio interview.
This story reminded me of the wacky remarks by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA 35) during the "Rodney King riots in Los Angeles where she stated that people were looting stores for diapers and baby formula. The only problem with the statement is that gun shops don't sell diapers and baby formula.
These are the people who run the country. Totally acluistic (meaning they don't have a clue).
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Today is April 1, 2010 April Fools Day and we at GODSPACT dedicate this day to the fools who are currenlty running the country.
To quote a friend who in a discussion regarding the current political situation in the United States today, refering to the Obamacons, he said "These people are all blinded by Satan."
Perhaps he is correct. I have never in my 51 years on this Earth have even see anything even close to this in an American leader, and the "Double Standards" in the State Controlled Media is blatant!
I just hope that these nut jobs remember all of this when the Republicans retake everything starting this November.
To quote a friend who in a discussion regarding the current political situation in the United States today, refering to the Obamacons, he said "These people are all blinded by Satan."
Perhaps he is correct. I have never in my 51 years on this Earth have even see anything even close to this in an American leader, and the "Double Standards" in the State Controlled Media is blatant!
I just hope that these nut jobs remember all of this when the Republicans retake everything starting this November.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
